Overall Assessment
✅ Looks good — no unmitigated P0/P1 findings.

Executive Summary

• No methodology defects found. The estimator-side edits are TYPE_CHECKING stubs only and do not change weighting, variance, identification assumptions, bootstrap behavior, or defaults in the touched estimators.
• Cross-checking the Methodology Registry against the touched bootstrap mixins shows no mismatch for Callaway-Sant’Anna, ImputationDiD, or TwoStageDiD.
• No new edge-case regressions were introduced in the modified estimator files: no new inline inference anti-patterns, NaN/Inf guard regressions, parameter-plumbing gaps, or control-group logic changes.
• TODO.md cleanup looks consistent with the codebase; it does not appear to hide unresolved correctness issues.
• Two minor P3 items remain around the new notebook workflow: environment drift risk and an overstated claim about catching external dataset URL breakage.

Methodology

• No findings. The only estimator changes are if TYPE_CHECKING: method stubs in diff_diff/staggered_bootstrap.py:122, diff_diff/imputation_bootstrap.py:71, and diff_diff/two_stage_bootstrap.py:44. Those do not execute at runtime, and the registry-defined SE/bootstrap behavior remains unchanged for docs/methodology/REGISTRY.md:1791, docs/methodology/REGISTRY.md:1793, and docs/methodology/REGISTRY.md:1794.

Code Quality

• No findings. The added stub signatures line up with the concrete helper implementations in diff_diff/staggered_aggregation.py:196, diff_diff/imputation.py:707, diff_diff/imputation.py:907, diff_diff/two_stage.py:1092, and diff_diff/two_stage.py:1274.

Performance

• No findings. No estimator hot path changed; the runtime impact is limited to adding a CI notebook job.

Maintainability

• Severity: P3. Impact: The new notebook workflow hard-codes a separate environment and runs notebooks from the source tree via PYTHONPATH=., which creates another dependency surface to keep in sync with the declared project install path and the notebook instructions. References: .github/workflows/notebooks.yml:35, .github/workflows/notebooks.yml:41, pyproject.toml:52, docs/tutorials/README.md:56, .github/workflows/rust-test.yml:80. Concrete fix: Install the package itself in this job (pip install -e . plus the minimal notebook/test extras, or pip install -e ".[dev]") and only keep a manual dependency list if it is explicitly marked as a keep-in-sync copy.

Tech Debt

• No findings. The TODO cleanup appears to remove resolved items rather than hide deferred correctness work. The updated HonestDiD notes are backed by existing code in diff_diff/honest_did.py:612 and diff_diff/honest_did.py:946.

Security

• No findings. No secrets handling, privilege escalation, or unsafe external-action pattern was introduced in the diff.

Documentation/Tests

• Severity: P3. Impact: The weekly schedule comment says it “catches external breakage (dataset URLs, etc.)”, but the tutorial dataset loaders fall back to cached or constructed data when downloads fail, so upstream URL breakage may be masked without failing CI. References: .github/workflows/notebooks.yml:19, diff_diff/datasets.py:31, diff_diff/datasets.py:65, diff_diff/datasets.py:218, diff_diff/datasets.py:362. Concrete fix: Either reword the comment to describe a periodic notebook smoke test, or add a separate scheduled dataset-availability smoke test that uses force_download=True and fails on download errors.
• Validation note: This review was static only. I did not run mypy or execute the notebook workflow locally because the review sandbox does not have the scientific Python dependencies installed (numpy import failed).

/ai-review

🔁 AI review rerun (requested by @igerber)

Head SHA: b731c338420e22eb20c444b44265bfe0d4e26860

Overall Assessment

✅ Looks good — no unmitigated P0/P1 findings.

Executive Summary

• Re-review status: the prior P3 about the scheduled-workflow comment overstating what weekly CI checks is resolved at .github/workflows/notebooks.yml:L18-L20; the prior environment-drift P3 remains informational at .github/workflows/notebooks.yml:L35-L41.
• The estimator-side edits in diff_diff/staggered_bootstrap.py:L122-L136, diff_diff/imputation_bootstrap.py:L71-L105, and diff_diff/two_stage_bootstrap.py:L44-L63 are TYPE_CHECKING-only stubs and do not change runtime estimator behavior.
• Cross-checking the affected methods against docs/methodology/REGISTRY.md:L311-L323, docs/methodology/REGISTRY.md:L822-L828, and docs/methodology/REGISTRY.md:L875-L893 found no undocumented deviation in weighting, variance/SE, assumptions, or defaults.
• No new edge-case regressions were introduced in the modified estimator files: no new inline inference code, partial NaN guards, empty-result handling changes, or control-group logic changes.
• TODO.md cleanup does not appear to hide unresolved correctness work; the HonestDiD status updates are consistent with diff_diff/honest_did.py:L612-L653 and diff_diff/honest_did.py:L946-L960.

Methodology

• No findings. The affected methods are Callaway-Sant’Anna’s combined IF/bootstrap interface, ImputationDiD’s bootstrap psi and balance_e helpers, and TwoStageDiD’s bootstrap GMM/FE helpers. The new declarations in diff_diff/staggered_bootstrap.py:L122-L136, diff_diff/imputation_bootstrap.py:L71-L105, and diff_diff/two_stage_bootstrap.py:L44-L63 mirror existing implementations in diff_diff/staggered_aggregation.py:L196-L208, diff_diff/imputation.py:L707-L766, diff_diff/imputation.py:L907-L924, diff_diff/two_stage.py:L1092-L1096, and diff_diff/two_stage.py:L1274-L1281.

Code Quality

• No findings. The stub signatures line up with the concrete helper methods they describe, and the modified bootstrap files do not introduce the prohibited inline inference pattern or partial NaN-guard pattern.

Performance

• No findings. The estimator hot paths are unchanged; the only runtime addition is notebook execution in CI.

Maintainability

• P3 Impact: .github/workflows/notebooks.yml:L35-L41 hard-codes a partial dependency set and relies on a handwritten .pth injection, which can drift from the declared dependency surface in pyproject.toml:L46-L63 and make notebook CI exercise a different environment from supported installs. Concrete fix: keep the current “no Rust build” approach if desired, but move notebook-runtime dependencies into a single source of truth such as a dedicated extra or requirements file and install from that, rather than duplicating package names inline in the workflow.

Tech Debt

• No findings. The TODO.md cleanup looks like removal of addressed items rather than masking of unresolved correctness debt, and the updated HonestDiD notes are backed by existing code at diff_diff/honest_did.py:L612-L653 and diff_diff/honest_did.py:L946-L960.

Security

• No findings. The new workflow uses the standard pull_request trigger, not pull_request_target, and does not add secrets handling or elevated permissions in .github/workflows/notebooks.yml:L3-L18.

Documentation/Tests

• No findings. The prior informational concern about overstating scheduled dataset-availability coverage is addressed by rewording the weekly schedule comment to a generic notebook smoke test at .github/workflows/notebooks.yml:L18-L20.

Review basis: static review only. The local environment did not have mypy, numpy, pandas, scipy, pytest, nbmake, or ipykernel, so I did not rerun mypy or execute the notebook workflow.